This movie was better than I thought it would be, but the characters are such idiots that I found it hard to enjoy the movie more than just marginally.

There ’s something I really do n’t understand . Why does Hollyweird always have such a Brobdingnagian want to adapt stage meet into movies ? It does n’t make any sense . With the recent release ofRentandThe Producers , I feel like I ’m in motion-picture show netherworld . The film adaptation ofCloser , drop a line by Patrick Marber and ground on his play , is a definitive instance of why I scarcely ever go to see stage play . Most of them are just too ghoulish and depressing to be enjoyable . I mean , think about it … when was the last time you saw a well-chosen , elate stage play ? And take my word for it , the words " happy " and " uplifting " are in no peril of being associated with this movie .

For all its faults , Closeris in reality quite well - made . In fact , it was better than I think it was going to be . It basically demand four people who talk for an hour and a half , so I was n’t expecting to be bungle away . The subject matter is irregular and edgy enough to be entertaining , though , if not a little shocking at times . ( youngster shouldnotsee this movie for more reasons than I have way to list here . ) The bottom line is that if you ’re go to organize a stage play , it ’s hard to find someone good than Mike Nichols . My biggest takings with Nichols ' film is that he tends to sharpen on observe the fabric edgy and intriguing , rather than entertaining the consultation . In some subject , that works really well , but with others , that ’s not quite the case . Overall , I mildly enjoyedCloser , but the pic is an exercise in foiling to check , as I ’ll explain .

The story is set in London , and it commence out with Dan ( play by Jude Law ) and Alice ( diddle by Natalie Portman ) escort each other from across a crowded street . Before Dan can introduce himself , though , Alice is readily pout down by a car while she ’s in the crosswalk , so he give-up the ghost with her to the hospital . It turns out that she did n’t sustain any major harm , but during the meter Dan and Alice have spent together , they really hit it off . tight - forward to a few month later , and Dan has written a book about the experience . He ’s in a photography studio find his pictorial matter occupy for the book cover , when it short dawns on him that the lensman , Anna ( played by Julia Roberts ) , is an attractive young woman . Despite the fact that Dan has a girlfriend , he remove on Anna , and after a little initial hesitancy , she reciprocate … sort of . From that point on , Dan is fascinated with Anna , but he still has tactual sensation for Alice . I was initiate to get a headache by this degree .

How Rachel Zegler’s

The next part of the story has Dan diddle an cyberspace prank on a doctor constitute Larry ( played by Clive Owen ) . Dan pretends that he ’s Anna , and he has Larry assemble her at a local marine museum . To everyone ’s surprisal , despite the initial ungainly mo , Larry and Anna really impinge on it off , and before you could say " totally unrealistic , " Larry and Anna are married . But do you think that ’s start to halt Dan and Anna from getting their lusus naturae on ? If you said " heck no , " give yourself a Au star ! Before you eff it , the family relationship between Dan and Alice is in trouble , then Anna and Larry ’s marriage is in trouble , then Dan tries to get together with Anna , then Larry tries to get together with Alice … I really had aseriousheadache by this point .

What really offend me about this movie was how open everyone was with each other . If the great unwashed really babble out like that in London , I never want to chitchat that space again . As an example , Anna describes to Larry ingraphicdetail about what she did with Dan , who had what response when , etc . And she tells that to Larry because he need her ! Call me gaga , but I ’m infer that ’s not something Dr. Phil would advocate to assist a struggling couple get the electric arc back into their relationship . The most frustrative thing about the movie is that out of the four lead characters , not one is clinically sane . They are all completely crackers , and they are all idiots . Dan is an moron for cheating on Alice even though they have a ( purportedly ) felicitous relationship . Alice is an idiot for staying with a loser like Dan . Anna is an changeling for getting take with a loser like Dan , even when she ’s married . Larry is an idiot for staying with Anna , even though he roll in the hay she ’s worry . When all the main theatrical role are moron , how can they be likable ? And how can a movie be enjoyable if there is n’t a single likeable fictional character in it ?

I wo n’t unwrap what eventually ends up pass off with all these dysfunctional relationships , but it really does n’t matter because we do n’t have much cause to care . This movie , if nothing else , serve as a great example of what you shouldnotdo if you require to keep a family relationship alive and well . For all its faults , though , the movie ultimately prevent the viewer concerned , not so much in what happens , but rather in the characters themselves . The story development is fairly lackluster , but the case developing is quite beneficial , as you would ask from a stage play . I mildly enjoyedCloserbecause it maintain me interested in find out more about the characters , but I could n’t revel it more than that because all the master characters were such idiots that it was hard to really deal about what happened to them . I think it ’s metre to go watchA Few Good Menagain . Now that ’s how a microscope stage play should be adapt into a moving picture …

Kaitlyn Santa Juana as Stefanie looking horrified in Final Destination Bloodlines

nigher is a drama picture directed by Mike Nichols , featuring Jude Law , Natalie Portman , Julia Roberts , and Clive Owen . The film explores the intricate and disruptive relationships between two couples in London , focusing on composition of erotic love , betrayal , and the complexness of human joining . The cross romantic entanglements among the four main characters do as a deep dive into the nature of closeness and satinpod .

Josh Hartnett looking shocked in Fight or Flight

Julia Roberts, Jude Law, Natalie Portman, and Clive Owen in Closer

Alice in a pink wig talking to Larry in Closer.

Closer is a drama film directed by Mike Nichols, featuring Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Julia Roberts, and Clive Owen. The film explores the intricate and tumultuous relationships between two couples in London, focusing on themes of love, betrayal, and the complexities of human connection. The intersecting romantic entanglements among the four main characters serve as a deep dive into the nature of intimacy and honesty.

Closer (2004) - Poster

Closer is a drama film directed by Mike Nichols, featuring Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Julia Roberts, and Clive Owen. The film explores the intricate and tumultuous relationships between two couples in London, focusing on themes of love, betrayal, and the complexities of human connection. The intersecting romantic entanglements among the four main characters serve as a deep dive into the nature of intimacy and honesty.